Difference Between AFCAT and CDS Exam

 CDS features a well defined syllabus and study of syllabus should be thorough. UPSC frames questions which tests your conceptual knowledge altogether its exams, same goes for CDS, whereas in AFCAT, as airforce isn't a permanent recruiting agency like UPSC its questions touch the topology of the themes only. Anybody with a radical basic knowledge of subjects like math's and English, and regular current affairs knowledge can Crack AFCAT easily without much effort but to Crack CDS definitely you would like to place effort in studying syllabus thoroughly. Here in this article we will discuss about difference between AFCAT and CDS exam in details by Gurukul career group best Afcat coaching in Chandigarh.

I won’t enter the syllabus; I have already got a drag regarding the brevity of my answers and that i don’t want to form it worse. you'll find the syllabus . Anyway, there are two strategies to tackle the CDS exam; you'll choose whichever suits you:

Strategy I - Picking everything and getting nothing

Here you cover all three papers comprehensively (two for OTA candidates including ladies) and hope to attain the above mentioned marks. choose this strategy only, and as long as you're mediocre or under-confident altogether three subjects (two for OTA). Also, if you’re extremely weak in anybody of the papers, then use this strategy. On the opposite hand, if a specific paper is your specialty , then this strategy would be a waste of precious time which might be allocated elsewhere and spent productively otherwise.

This is a tried and tested strategy and therefore the safest recourse not only for CDS, except for any exam.

Strategy II - Overcompensation and Bare Survival

This strategy has the simplest cost-benefit ratio in terms of your time and energy invested in studying, although it are often very risky depending upon the problem of the paper, so I’d recommend it only you've got an absolute command over a minimum of one paper of CDS and you've got steadfast confidence about your performance therein paper, regardless of the problem level of the paper. Here, you augment your already strong bastion therein particular paper, which takes minimal effort and time while studying almost enough to urge a score above the sectional cutoff in your other papers. So your extremely high marks in one subject catch up on the relatively poor marks within the other subjects, where you’re barely surviving.

Now, does one see why this strategy is so risky ? a nasty ascertainment of these papers means failure to attain even sectional cutoff which essentially means you’ve failed the exam. But like I said before, this is often extremely time-saving and demands way less effort than Strategy I, so you'll use this strategy to splendid effect albeit you don’t have enough time on your hands, say, if you have already got a busy job, or extremely demanding college work.